Fuel Substitutions
May/June 2000
Bad
for business!
Service station operators selling adulterated fuel in
Sydney have been treated by the popular press as people in the same
class as bag snatchers and child molesters - the public doesn't like
them. Politicians whose departments are successful in prosecuting those
running and profiting from fuel substitution rackets in NSW and other
states are likely to see strong public support.
Initially, it would probably be the vehicle operator that
would be identified, but if that operator were not aware that they had
purchased adulterated fuel the EPA action would flow on to the fuel
retailer. Once again, more big fines. If schonk operators are banking
on government inaction, as they have in the past, then they should think
again.
Engine Damage
Finally there is the question of engine damage to vehicles running on
tax-dodging fuel cocktails. Most popular locally built vehicles seem
to be fairly tolerant, providing toluene levels aren't too high for
too long.
Ford stated that a Falcon run consistently on high toluene
content fuel could suffer cylinder head damage which, being uncharacteristic
in this engine, would lead service engineers to identify fuel adulteration
as a problem.
Toyota mentioned damage to seals and non-metallic components
in the fuel injection system, and in extreme cases possible breakdown
of lubricating oils leading to major engine damage.
Modern diesel engines however, are proving far more sensitive to adulterated
fuel. Injection systems in expensive 4WD power units have failed after
a single tank filling of adulterated fuel and the manufacturer has passed
the warranty claim on to the fuel provider. One case currently under
scrutiny involves a cost of over $8000 to repair the fuel injection
system of a two-litre turbo diesel engine.
Modern heavy vehicle power units can be just as sensitive
and rebuilding the fuel injection system of a new Euro 3 compatible
MAN power unit is going to cost a lot more than $8000, with possible
claims for down time of the vehicle.
Eventually Australia will be forced to accept specific
standards for both petrol and diesel fuel formulation and this will
help regulatory authorities prosecuting those who sell adulterated product.
In the US, fuel retailers who sell anything other than the precisely
defined product can find themselves in gaol. The implementation of similarly
stringent sanctions against fuel cheats in Australia is bound to meet
with strong public approval.
But possibly the ultimate sanction, particularly for
the small family run servo in a quiet city suburban area or country
town, would be the loss of customers and the collapse of the business.
Short memory syndrome would assist the big turnover main road site with
a large casual passing trade survive, but not the little guy who is
possibly most tempted to resort to fuel adulteration to stay in the
game.
One paragraph from the court reporter in the local paper
could mean the end for a small site offender. In March of this year,
the long running petrol substitution racket finally came under public
scrutiny, and the howls of protest didn't die down until the government
excise and rebate scheme appeared to remove the incentive for adding
large quantities of toluene to automotive fuel.
Mark Kevin, Managing Director of Liberty Petroleum, was
a prime mover in the campaign to expose the toluene scam. He is pleased
that the Federal Government finally placed excise on this particular
substance, but warns that there are still a few unscrupulous operators
who like to mix their own fuel cocktails using other lower tax level
substitutes in petrol and diesel fuel.
Rogue
Operators
Though it had been common knowledge in the industry that large volumes
of tax free toluene was being pumped into Australian motorists' fuel
tanks, authorities did little to stop it. Until recently it was under
Federal responsibility, specifically, Australian Customs and Excise,
and it is they who should have been testing service station fuel stock.
It would appear that Customs was too busy in other areas to offer much
of a threat to rogue operators.
Now that the job of fuel supply inspection has been turned
over to individual state fair trading and consumer protection agencies,
things may well get tougher for those involved in fuel adulteration.
There is now significant pressure on politicians to fix what consumers
view as a total rip off. At a time when fuel prices have risen dramatically,
the motoring public is only too aware that the high levels of tax they
pay and resent, is in some cases going to line the pockets of racketeers,
which they resent even more.
New South Wales, with the current labour administration,
is more than happy to make political capital out of the coalition Federal
Government's previous lack of action.
The Victorian Government Department of Fair Trading has
decreed that the limit for toluene levels in petrol is 15%, and diesel
must have a flashpoint above 61 degrees Celsius. Anything below that
is defined as a Class 3 Flammable. Fines in Victoria for individuals
prosecuted under the Fair Trading Act are $24,000 for an individual
and $60,000 for a company.
No Standards
In Queensland, penalties at this time are limited to naming those outlets
that sell petrol with more than 10% toluene content.
One of the difficulties in prosecuting those selling
toluene as petrol has been the absence of an Australian Standard for
'petrol'. New South Wales Minister for Fair Trading, John Watkins, stated
in parliament on April 4, that " because of the continuing possibility
of adulteration occurring and the likelihood that the Federal Government
will continue to shirk its duty, I have sought further advice to ascertain
how we in NSW can take prosecution action against those who continue
to flout the law. This follows my concerns that stronger enforcement
action than naming be taken if the problem continues.
"I am pleased to advise the House that the Crown
Solicitor has now provided legal advice to guide the Department's continuing
investigations.
"The Crown Solicitor has advised that action can
be taken under the Fair Trading Act against operators found to be supplying
petrol with high levels of toluene."
Mr Watkins gave details of increased
levels of random inspection and specific examples of service stations
identified as sellers of adulterated petrol. From now on service station
owners who sell adulterated fuel in NSW face a fine of up to $110,000,
and once identified and convicted, could face further prosecution from
the NSW Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as adulterated fuel may
produce emission levels that contravene clean air regulations.