Accounting
May/June 2001
Opting
to Calculate GST the
easy way
In this article Accountant, Geoff Coy looks at how
accepting the ATO's offer to calculate and pay your GST the easy way
may not be in your best interests.
In recent issues we have looked at the impact of GST on
your business and a 'rule of thumb' method of calculating an approximate
sum of money to cover GST commitments.
Recently, the ATO wrote to business owners and outlined
a simplified method of calculating and remitting GST with a view to
reducing the bookkeeping and reporting burden on small business owners.
Business
owners were given 3 options.
The
first option was to:
ª Keep the present situation by
calculating, paying and reporting quarterly.
The
second option was to:
Continue to calculate and pay quarterly
ª Report some
basic information quarterly
ªReport the remainder of the information
annually
The third option
was to:
ª Pay an amount each quarter worked out
by the ATO. This is based on the amounts paid by you in the previous
two quarters.
ªReport
some basic information quarterly
ª Report the remainder of the information
annually
ªPay
or get refunded the difference at the end of the financial year.
If you have been happy in the way your business has been
calculating and paying your GST and PAYG instalments then there is no
need to change - particularly if you have the necessary bookkeeping
and accounting systems in place.
Selecting the second option means that you still need
to account for and pay the GST in the same way that you are doing now.
The only difference being that most of the reporting is completed at
the end of the financial year rather than with the quarterly BAS return.
The third option is really the 'easy way out' for small
business owners who have not come to terms with the extra effort required
to account for GST.
The main problem in selecting this option as far as it
relates to the service station and convenience store industry is due
to seasonal factors.
By choosing the amount calculated by the ATO your business
will pay an amount of GST based on the first six months of trading as
opposed to the actual GST for the quarter.
For
example, Con's Convenience Store paid the following GST:
ª September quarter $7,000
ª December quarter $8,000
The ATO calculated Con's third quarter GST at $7,500 and gave him the
same options as discussed above.
At the end of the March quarter Con stocked up considerably
in his store and was holding more fuel than normal.
Con was able to claim the input tax credits on the stock
purchases in his BAS return for that quarter but not required to remit
the GST until the stock had been sold.
For this reason the GST to be remitted for the third quarter
dropped to $5,000. This was less than the $5,000 figure calculated by
the ATO and resulted in a similar saving to Con's cash flow for the
same period.
Alternatively, had Con sold all the stock he purchased
in that quarter it is possible that the actual GST would have been higher
than that calculated by the ATO. In this instance Con's cash flow would
have benefited if he had selected the ATO's calculation. The shortfall
would then need to be made up at the end of the financial year.
With the change in seasons to autumn then winter, Con
is also expecting a slowdown in turnover for the fourth quarter which
should also impact on less GST to remit.
This is another reason why Con should elect not to change
the way in which he calculates, reports and remits his GST
Due to the introduction of the GST Con has introduced
new accounting procedures to his business. Despite the extra time spent
in accounting for and reporting on the GST Con is receiving more accurate
and timely reports on his business and has a better handle on his cash
flow.
He has decided not to take the easy way out.